INF506 OLJ Post 2

What is Library 2.0? 

Activity Visit ASU's collection of The Library Minute videos and view five (5) of these one minute videos, then visit two (2) of the other Web 2.0 tools used as part of the ASU Library Channel suite at http://lib.asu.edu/librarychannel/.

Write a critical evaluation on ASU Libraries use of these platforms to achieve  the 4Cs of social media (in no more than 350 words).

The four underlying principles of Web 2.0 tools are : Content, Collaboration, Community and Collective Intelligence. Taken together, these four themes constitute the value system of social media. A recent underlying principle is also Crowd Sourcing. (Hay, 2012)
Collaboration, refers to the idea that social media facilitates the combination of small individual actions into meaningful collective results. As the participants engage with compelling content, the content becomes the centre of conversations.  Community, refers to the idea that social media facilitates sustained collaboration around a shared idea, over time and often across space. Content Creation, refers to the idea that social media tools allow everyone to become a creator, by making the publishing and distribution of multimedia content both free and relatively easy.
Crowd sourcing allows us to source a crowd for answers through social media. It can offer a valuable and beneficial option for getting information or an opinion on a given topic.

The Library Channel at the Arizona State University (ASU) produces podcasts, videos, and the award-winning Library Minute series to inform the ASU community about services and events.

The Library Channel was created collaboratively by librarians within the ASU libraries.

It has links to Web2.0 tools and SN sites like twitter, YouTube, flickr, vimeo, itunes and Facebook. – opportunities for content creation.

Facebook http://www.facebook.com/ASULibraries

allows for opportunities to promote the library and library events to the wider community of users, ability for users to share the information and post comments.It also allows for crowd sourcing to allow for the community to voice their opinions and then the library can make informed decisions.

The Twitter account has over 2,000 followers and there have been over 1300 tweets.  It informs users of events, provides update on resources and allows for interaction  with users and other branches.
The Library Minute  caters for all members of the community. There is a mixture of visual and aural effects. Amongst the information presented there are word images, real life scenes, video shorts - from current and olden day movies and TV shows- , diagrams, and most of all humour. There is the opportunity to stop the presentation at any time and rewind 

The presentations cover: possible  use  of the variety of learning spaces, resources and  ongoing digital technological development which enhances twenty-first century learning for twenty-first century learners.   
References 
* ASU Libraries. (2013) Facebook. Retrieved January 30 from http://www.facebook.com/ASULibraries *   ASU Libraries. (2012). The Library Channel. Retrieved 18 December, 2012, from http://lib.asu.edu/librarychannel/ 
*  ASU Libraries. (2009). Library Minute : Fun Things at the Library. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOsiYx9orK8&list=PLCA6A813AA9C9A574&index=5 
* ASU Libraries. (2009). Library Minute : Interlibrary Loan Document Delivery. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nKw6nnlyJA&list=PLCA6A813AA9C9A574&index=2 
* ASU Libraries.(2012). Library Minute : Mobile Security. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKDeVTo2w0k&list=PLCA6A813AA9C9A574&index=1 
* ASU Libraries. (2010). Library Minute : Open Access. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO38zHPhNQI&list=PLCA6A813AA9C9A574&index=8 
* ASU Libraries. (2011). Library Minute : Study Spaces. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi_SGY8niCY&list=PLCA6A813AA9C9A574&index=3 
*ASU Libraries. (2013) twitter. Retrieved January 30 from http://twitter.com/ASUlibraries 
* Hay, L. (2012). What is Library 2.0? [INF506 Module 3]. Retrieved February 2, 2013, from Charles Sturt University website: http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/INF506_201290_W_D/page/84cf677e-ec91-4f08-8080-0f7dd953df21 
* Mishra, G. (2009). Digital Activism & the 4Cs Social Media Framework . Retrieved from http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/11/digital-activism-the-4cs-social-media-framework/

Thoughts after  Reading The Intro and section 1 and 2 of the following

De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Havens, A., Hawk, J. & Jenkins, L. (2007). Sharing privacy and trust in our networked world: A report to the OCLC membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC.  [ebook] Available http://www.oclc.org/reports/pdfs/sharing.pdf

How do the concepts and findings in these sections of the OCLC report reflect your view of the socially networked world in 2012?

The socially networked world is a fast growing phenomenon. So fast in fact that many people do not stop to investigate various sites and the potential 'side effects'. People from older generations seem to be more cautious. Many of my friends 50+ are not on any networked site or if they are they use it sparingly.

I am amazed how many friends or acquaintances do not fully understand repercussions. I am also staggered by the amount of children under the age of 13 who are on sites such as Facebook. It seems that either their parents have allowed this or they themselves have altered the date of birth. These young people have interesting photos and they name their acquaintances. They have not put safety checks in place.

It is amazing how you can follow links and learn information about' friends' of  'friends' . I am certain that they wold be unaware who has access to these. The more prudent people are those who block the way, unless you ask to be invited.

I feel that I am more secure by being part of a group, like INF. It is a responsible way of learning about various aspects of networking.

I was also amazed how many sites are out there in the world. I also discovered that many of the findings were not surprising to me.

INF 506 Assignment 1: OLJ creation and first entry
A. What is Social Networking?

Social networking is a method of interacting with other people through a variety of digital media and technologies. It establishes interconnected internet communities that enable users to make contact with others with common interests, from around the world. Social networking enables users to articulate and make visible their social interests. This can result in connection between individuals and within groups.

Social networking has enabled internet users from being mainly searchers of information to being creators of information, building content and establishing online communities. It allows users to think critically, communicate with others, collaborate on projects and to be creative.

B. My Social networking technologies and sites

I started this blog as part of my TL studies.
 
I joined Facebook about 2 years ago but usually access it when I get an e-mail that informs me that there is new activity.I usually ask advice from my sons, in their early twenties, for assistance.

I am an avid user of Skype as I have friends and family overseas and interstate.  You can chat, view and post messages. It is not a Web 2.0 tool but it is a form of connection with others. I find it easier to keep the thread of the conversation.

C. My Expected Learning Outcome on INF506

     
As a 21st century teacher and learner I am aware of the need to be open to new technologies. Since commencing my CSU studies in November 2011 I have become more aware of this. I also have a daughter who is in her first year of high school and I feel it is important for me to try to understand some of the social networking  sites that are available. I hope that my immersion in this subject will enable me to be a more confident active participant in 21st Century technologies. I look forward to learning  about the ethical standards and benefits, of social networking ,for school communities

ETL504 Choosing a Change Process Model to allay teacher concerns about a Web2.0 App

Assessment 1 Part B

Introduction
The purpose of this paper (presentation) is to show how teacher concerns, towards a Web2.0 App., can be addressed through them experiencing stages in a change process model. The model experienced will be The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). The CBAM is a change model in which relationships between users and the resource system of an innovation can be examined. (Donovan, 2007, p.267). In this presentation the users will be a small group of primary school teachers and the resource will be a Web 2.0 App. The App chosen will be a Blog. The teacher librarian (TL) will be the facilitator of the change.

Description of a Web2.0App

A Web 2.0 App is characterised by three elements: information sharing, user-cantered design and collaboration (Crotty, R. 2012). A Blog is a Web 2.0 App

"Blog" is an abbreviated version of "weblog," which is a term used to describe web sites that maintain an ongoing chronicle of information. It is a publishing tool that allows authors to quickly and easily self-publish text, artwork, links to other blogs or Web sites, and a whole array of other content. (Crie, 2006)

In education blogs have many educational benefits. Some of these are:

Blogs work well for students because they can be worked on at virtually any time, in any place with an Internet-enabled computer.  A class blog opens the opportunity for students to discuss topics outside of the classroom. Students have time to be reactive to one another and reflective.

Teachers can also bring together a group of knowledgeable individuals for a given unit of study for students to network and conference with on a blog.

Blogs can be effective forums for collaboration and discussion.

Summary of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)

The Concerns-Based Adoption Model, or CBAM, is a conceptual framework first proposed in 1973 by Hall, Wallace, and Dossett. It describes, explains, and predicts probable teacher concerns and behaviours throughout the school change process.

In today's new era of accountability in education, CBAM can help districts and schools respond to federal requirements for standards-based reform as well as fostering a culture of continuous improvement. (Intro)

The three diagnostic tools of the CBAM user system are the Stages of Concern (SoC), Levels of Use (LoU), and Innovation Configurations (IC). (Donovan, 2007, p.267). Stages of Concern (SoC) use a questionnaire to help identify and describe the concerns teachers have during the implementation process. They are a way of accessing information about people's attitudes, or reactions, or feelings about a new program or a new practice. (Hord , in CBAM Video SoC).  Levels of Use (LoU) use an interview protocol to assess the degree to which a teacher is using an innovation. Innovation Configurations (IC) is a tool for identifying and describing the various forms of an innovation that different teachers adopt. Intro what it does is to explicitly spell out what the new practice will look like when it is in operation in the classroom." (Hord in CBAM  Video IC Transcript.)

The first principal diagnostic dimension of CBAM is Stages of Concern.

There are seven different stages of feelings and perceptions that educators experience when they are implementing a new program or practice (SEDL)

The first three concerns are focused on self, the next concern is on the mastery of the task, and the last three concerns are around results and impact on others.

The second principal diagnostic dimension of CBAM is Levels of Use:

There are eight behavioural profiles that describe a different set of actions and behaviours that educators engage in as they become more familiar with and more skilled in using an innovation or adopting a change (SEDL)

The third principal diagnostic dimension of CBAM is Innovation Configurations.
Different ways an innovation may be implemented, shown along a continuum from ideal implementation or practice to least desirable practice

An Overview of a plan for implementation of Blogs

Stage of concern	Level of use		Innovation Configuration (TL as change facilitator)
	0. Non-Use There is no action or involvement.		The teachers in the selected group are not familiar with blogs
Level 0 Awareness There is no awareness of any change taking place			Use a questionnaire to help identify and describe the concerns the focus group has during the implementation process. Make the group aware of the characterisation of Web2.0 Apps through their three elements: information sharing, user-centred design and collaboration. Brainstorm if they know any. Refer to state guidelines and standards as to the expectation of the need to use Information Technology in a collaborative and interactive way. Explain that a Blog is a Web2.0 App. for the above reasons.
Level 1 Informational Seeking information			Send out a description of Blogs and their educational benefits by e-mail and also place a hard copy in their staff ‘mailboxes. Ask the members to peruse the information and to highlight or record any insights or concerns. Encourage them to send questions to you via email or through mailbox.
	0I. Orientation There is a general interest and group members are taking an initiative to learn more about the innovation.		Provide workshops to share insights and to address the concerns from the previous literature. Provide opportunity for other members of staff, with previous experience with blogs, to come to the workshop. Share state and national guidelines and acceptable use policies (AUP) regarding the use of school and other computer networks and the Internet.
Level 2 Personal How will using it affect me?			Conduct demonstrations of setting up different blogs for different purposes. Provide time management on a personal basis.  Allocate varied times for each group member. Choose times that are convenient for group members.
	II. Preparation There are definite plans to begin participating with the innovation. The members are learning the processes and skills needed for successful application.		Model and practice with teaming strategies and form a consensus on area for group to focus. It could be on an interest level, for example, Recipes or on an educational level. Encourage the group members to blog on a regular basis.
Use begins
		III. Mechanical Early stages of application. Emphasis is on day to day use of the innovation with little reflection	Encourage study and research to deepen content knowledge about blogs. Promote team members regular self-assessments of their teamwork
Level 3 Management How can I master the skills and fit it all in?			Provide suggestions for time management for blogging in the classroom. Organise some release time to gather and organise materials and walk through procedures. Provide logistical help and support Review policies and guidelines pertaining to student access
		IVA.Routine Few or no changes are being made. There is limited though given to improving the use of the innovation.	Encourage further study and research to deepen content knowledge about blogs. Take the necessary steps to inform parents of procedures and secure parental permission before using the blog in a participatory manner. Determine that all students' AUPs are in place and up to date. Teach students safe, acceptable, and sensible behaviour as online authors and readers. Teach the non-posting rules of no complete names, e-mail accounts, or references to reveal location. Set clear expectations regarding tone, respect, and consequences.
Level 4 Consequence How can I refine it to have more impact?			Provide or organise professional development focused on areas where teachers want to enhance student learning. Remember to form a consensus on area for group to focus. Provide discussion around suggestions for broadening students’ participation and motivation.
		IVB.Refinement Changes are being made to the innovation to increase impact and consequences.	As a group develop and use joint instructional strategies. Allow for group members to observe each other using the instructional strategies. Examine student work- are the using safe, acceptable, and sensible behaviour as online authors and readers.
Level 5 Collaboration How can I relate what I am doing to what others are doing?			Organise opportunities for collaborative teaching and use of demonstration lessons.
		V. Integration Intentional efforts are being made to collaborate with others to have a combined impact.	Share blog activities and information across the school community. Work with colleagues to further develop joint instructional practices
Level 6 Refocusing I have some ideas about something that would work even better			Review the key elements of blogs. Engage students in self-assessment of how well they are using blogs and what could they do to strengthen it.
		VI. Renewal Group members reflect on the innovation and investigate ways to make the innovation effective to achieve greater impact.	Provide consistent and regular support

 

Planned on-going support
In the book Taking Charge of Change (Hord, Rutherford, Huling-Austin, & Hall,1987), the authors propose that before change can happen in schools, teachers need to pass through several stages of concern. Only when teachers reach the top “impact” stages of concern will the innovation be implemented appropriately.

It can take a long time for the CBAM process to conclude, sometimes even years. Teachers will be at various levels of the model. At times various outside factors can prevent the initial target group from completing the change process. As new technologies are made available sometimes a Web2.0 App. might be superseded by something more user –friendly.

The initial focus group could be encouraged to collaborate with the TL in presenting the blog, using the CBAM they experienced, to another group of teachers that are at the lower levels of concern and use. As more teachers became confident they could then continue the process.

The TL could adapt the CBAM to another Web 2.0 App or another educational innovation.

The focus group could join a professional blog and share their knowledge with other teachers in other parts of the world. The TL is to continue to support focus group as well as new groups, through the use of the CBAM and its diagnostic tools of the Stages of Concern (SoC), Levels of Use (LoU), and Innovation Configurations (IC).

 References

1. Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Introduction to the CBAM http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=Intro.  Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
2. Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Innovation Configurations http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=IC. Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
3. Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Levels of Use http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=LoU. Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
4. Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Stages of Concern http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=SoC. Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
5. Crie, M ((2006). Using Blogs to Integrate Technology in the Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/educationupclose.phtml/47
6. Crotty, R, (2012) ETL 504 Wiki Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D/page/48cd9b13-d594-413b-00e2-10148aa9c4d3
7. Donovan, L., Hartley, K & Strudler, N. (Spring, 2007) Teacher Concerns During Initial Implementation of a One-to-One Laptop Initiative at Middle School Level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263-286. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ehost/detail?sid=2ea02c8a-882d-46b3-86a4-9a2ecbba0e6f%40sessionmgr113&vid=1&hid=113&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=tsh&AN=24840241