Assessment
1 Part B
Introduction
The purpose of this paper (presentation) is to show how teacher concerns, towards a Web2.0 App., can be addressed through them experiencing stages in a change process model. The model experienced will be The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). The CBAM is a change model in which relationships between users and the resource system of an innovation can be examined. (Donovan, 2007, p.267). In this presentation the users will be a small group of primary school teachers and the resource will be a Web 2.0 App. The App chosen will be a Blog. The teacher librarian (TL) will be the facilitator of the change.
Description
of a Web2.0App
A
Web 2.0 App is characterised by three elements: information sharing, user-cantered
design and collaboration (Crotty, R. 2012). A Blog is a Web 2.0 App
"Blog" is an abbreviated version
of "weblog," which is a term used to describe web sites that maintain
an ongoing chronicle of information. It is a publishing tool that allows
authors to quickly and easily self-publish text, artwork, links to other blogs
or Web sites, and a whole array of other content. (Crie, 2006)
In education blogs have many educational
benefits. Some of these are:
Blogs work well for students because they
can be worked on at virtually any time, in any place with an Internet-enabled
computer. A class blog opens the
opportunity for students to discuss topics outside of the classroom. Students
have time to be reactive to one another and reflective.
Teachers can also bring together a group
of knowledgeable individuals for a given unit of study for students to network
and conference with on a blog.
Blogs can be effective forums for
collaboration and discussion.
Summary
of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)
The
Concerns-Based Adoption Model, or CBAM, is a conceptual framework first proposed in 1973
by Hall, Wallace, and Dossett. It describes, explains, and predicts probable teacher concerns and
behaviours throughout the school change process.
In
today's new era of accountability in education, CBAM can help districts and
schools respond to federal requirements for standards-based reform as well as
fostering a culture of continuous improvement. (Intro)
The three diagnostic tools of the CBAM
user system are the Stages of Concern (SoC), Levels of Use (LoU), and
Innovation Configurations (IC). (Donovan, 2007, p.267). Stages of Concern (SoC)
use a questionnaire to help identify and describe the concerns teachers have
during the implementation process. They are a way of accessing information
about people's attitudes, or reactions, or feelings about a new program or a
new practice. (Hord , in CBAM Video SoC). Levels of Use (LoU) use an interview protocol
to assess the degree to which a teacher is using an innovation. Innovation
Configurations (IC) is a tool for identifying and describing the various forms
of an innovation that different teachers adopt. Intro what it does is to
explicitly spell out what the new practice will look like when it is in
operation in the classroom." (Hord in CBAM
Video IC Transcript.)
The first principal diagnostic
dimension of CBAM is Stages of Concern.
There are seven different
stages of feelings and perceptions that educators experience when they are
implementing a new program or practice (SEDL)
The first three concerns are focused on
self, the next concern is on the mastery of the task, and the last three
concerns are around results and impact on others.
The second principal
diagnostic dimension of CBAM is Levels
of Use:
There are eight behavioural
profiles that describe a different set of actions and behaviours that educators
engage in as they become more familiar with and more skilled in using an
innovation or adopting a change (SEDL)
The third principal diagnostic
dimension of CBAM is Innovation Configurations.Different ways an innovation may be implemented, shown along a continuum from ideal implementation or practice to least desirable practice
An
Overview of a plan for implementation of Blogs
Stage
of concern
|
Level
of use
|
Innovation Configuration
(TL
as change facilitator)
|
|
0.
Non-Use
There is no action or involvement.
|
The
teachers in the selected group are not familiar with blogs
|
||
Level
0
Awareness
There is no awareness of any change taking place
|
Use
a questionnaire to help identify and describe the concerns the focus group
has during the implementation process.
Make
the group aware of the characterisation of Web2.0 Apps through their three
elements: information sharing, user-centred design and collaboration.
Brainstorm if they know any. Refer to state guidelines and standards as to
the expectation of the need to use Information Technology in a collaborative
and interactive way. Explain that a Blog is a Web2.0 App. for the above
reasons.
|
||
Level
1
Informational
Seeking information
|
Send
out a description of Blogs and their educational benefits by e-mail and also
place a hard copy in their staff ‘mailboxes. Ask the members to peruse the
information and to highlight or record any insights or concerns. Encourage
them to send questions to you via email or through mailbox.
|
||
0I.
Orientation
There is a general interest and group members are taking an
initiative to learn more about the innovation.
|
Provide
workshops to share insights and to address the concerns from the previous
literature. Provide opportunity for other members of staff, with previous
experience with blogs, to come to the workshop.
Share
state and national guidelines and acceptable use policies (AUP) regarding the
use of school and other computer networks and the Internet.
|
||
Level
2
Personal
How will using it affect me?
|
Conduct
demonstrations of setting up different blogs for different purposes. Provide
time management on a personal basis.
Allocate varied times for each group member. Choose times that are
convenient for group members.
|
||
II.
Preparation
There are definite plans to begin participating with the
innovation. The members are learning the processes and skills needed for
successful application.
|
Model
and practice with teaming strategies and form a consensus on area for group
to focus. It could be on an interest level, for example, Recipes or on an
educational level. Encourage the group members to blog on a regular basis.
|
||
Use
begins
|
|||
III.
Mechanical
Early stages of
application. Emphasis is on day to day use of the innovation with little
reflection
|
Encourage
study and research to deepen content knowledge about blogs.
Promote
team members regular self-assessments of their teamwork
|
||
Level
3
Management
How can I master the skills and fit it all in?
|
Provide suggestions for time
management for blogging in the classroom.
Organise some release time to
gather and organise materials and walk through procedures.
Provide
logistical help and support
Review policies and guidelines
pertaining to student access
|
||
IVA.Routine
Few or no changes are being made. There is limited though given
to improving the use of the innovation.
|
Encourage further study and research to
deepen content knowledge about blogs.
Take
the necessary steps to inform parents of procedures and secure parental
permission before using the blog in a participatory manner.
Determine
that all students' AUPs are in place and up to date. Teach students safe,
acceptable, and sensible behaviour as online authors and readers. Teach the
non-posting rules of no complete names, e-mail accounts, or references to
reveal location. Set clear expectations regarding tone, respect, and
consequences.
|
||
Level
4
Consequence
How can I refine it to have more impact?
|
Provide
or organise professional development focused on areas where teachers want to
enhance student learning. Remember to form a consensus on area for group to
focus.
Provide
discussion around suggestions for broadening students’ participation and
motivation.
|
||
IVB.Refinement
Changes are being made to the innovation to increase impact and
consequences.
|
As
a group develop and use joint instructional strategies.
Allow
for group members to observe each other using the instructional strategies.
Examine student work- are the using safe, acceptable, and sensible behaviour
as online authors and readers.
|
||
Level
5
Collaboration
How can I relate what I
am doing to what others are doing?
|
Organise
opportunities for collaborative teaching and use of demonstration lessons.
|
||
V.
Integration
Intentional efforts are
being made to collaborate with others to have a combined impact.
|
Share
blog activities and information across the school community.
Work
with colleagues to further develop joint instructional practices
|
||
Level
6
Refocusing
I have some ideas about
something that would work even better
|
Review
the key elements of blogs.
Engage
students in self-assessment of how well they are using blogs and what could
they do to strengthen it.
|
||
VI.
Renewal
Group members reflect on the innovation and investigate ways to
make the innovation effective to achieve greater impact.
|
Provide
consistent and regular support
|
||
Planned
on-going support
In the book Taking Charge of Change (Hord, Rutherford, Huling-Austin, & Hall,1987), the authors propose that before change can happen in schools, teachers need to pass through several stages of concern. Only when teachers reach the top “impact” stages of concern will the innovation be implemented appropriately.
It can take a long time for the CBAM
process to conclude, sometimes even years. Teachers will be at various levels
of the model. At times various outside factors can prevent the initial target
group from completing the change process. As new technologies are made
available sometimes a Web2.0 App. might be superseded by something more user
–friendly.In the book Taking Charge of Change (Hord, Rutherford, Huling-Austin, & Hall,1987), the authors propose that before change can happen in schools, teachers need to pass through several stages of concern. Only when teachers reach the top “impact” stages of concern will the innovation be implemented appropriately.
The initial focus group could be encouraged to collaborate with the TL in presenting the blog, using the CBAM they experienced, to another group of teachers that are at the lower levels of concern and use. As more teachers became confident they could then continue the process.
The TL could adapt the CBAM to another Web
2.0 App or another educational innovation.
The focus group could join a professional
blog and share their knowledge with other teachers in other parts of the world.
The TL is to continue to support focus group as well as new groups, through the
use of the CBAM and its diagnostic tools of the Stages of Concern (SoC), Levels
of Use (LoU), and Innovation Configurations (IC).- Concerns-Based
Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Introduction to the CBAM
http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=Intro. Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
- Concerns-Based
Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Innovation Configurations http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=IC.
Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
- Concerns-Based
Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Levels of Use http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=LoU.
Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
- Concerns-Based
Adoption Model (CBAM) Video: Stages of Concern http://www.sedl.org/cbam/videos.cgi?movie=SoC.
Retrieved from http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D
- Crie,
M ((2006). Using Blogs to Integrate Technology in the Classroom. Retrieved
from http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/educationupclose.phtml/47
- Crotty,
R, (2012) ETL 504 Wiki Retrieved from
http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/ETL504_201260_W_D/page/48cd9b13-d594-413b-00e2-10148aa9c4d3
- Donovan,
L., Hartley, K & Strudler, N. (Spring, 2007) Teacher Concerns During
Initial Implementation of a One-to-One Laptop Initiative at Middle School
Level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263-286.
Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ehost/detail?sid=2ea02c8a-882d-46b3-86a4-9a2ecbba0e6f%40sessionmgr113&vid=1&hid=113&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=tsh&AN=24840241
No comments:
Post a Comment